Claude Devs 宣布本周起变更 Fable 5 的安全措施:被标记的请求将可见地回退至 Opus 4.8(与网络、生物安全一致),API 同时返回拒绝理由。此前采用的不可见措施虽能快速部署且误报极少,却让用户无法了解触发原因。可见措施易被破解,需要更多误报以保持鲁棒性;团队正同步调优生物/网络分类器以减少对无害请求的误报。用户可通过 `/feedback`、thumbs-down 或 appeal 表单反馈误判。
We're rolling out changes to make Fable 5's safeguards for frontier LLM development visible.
Starting this week, flagged requests will visibly fall back to Opus 4.8-the same as our safeguards for cyber and bio. You will see this every time it happens. On the API, any flagged requests will return a reason for their refusal (coming to server-side fallback in the next few days).
We wanted to deploy Fable 5 to our users quickly and safely. Visible safeguards can be probed, so they have to be robust, which takes time to get right. Invisible safeguards can be targeted more narrowly, allowing us to ship quickly with very few false positives. We went with invisible safeguards for this reason-and that was the wrong tradeoff. You should have visibility into the safeguards we have in place, and why. We're sorry for not getting the balance right.
Making the safeguards visible makes them easier to work around, so keeping them robust to jailbreaks will unfortunately mean more false positives while we improve the classifiers. We're also tuning our bio and cyber classifiers to trigger less often on harmless requests. We know this is frustrating and we'll do our best to keep this period as short as possible.
If you think a request has been mistakenly flagged: run /feedback in Claude Code, click thumbs-down on the fallback in http://Claude.ai or Cowork, or file the safeguard appeal form for API requests. Your reports help us tune these classifiers and we appreciate your feedback. https://support.claude.com/en/articles/8241253-safeguards-warnings-and-appeals